- #LINUX MINT VS ELEMENTARY OS MAC OS#
- #LINUX MINT VS ELEMENTARY OS PC#
- #LINUX MINT VS ELEMENTARY OS MAC#
(Left: DFM, right: Nemo, bottom: Pantheon Files)Īs a consequence to have own D.E., then, they have their own file managers too. Seeing Deepin, there is theme switcher available, but to compare with Mint's, it's still very limited. Within the OS itself, we do not see any theme switcher available.
#LINUX MINT VS ELEMENTARY OS MAC#
Seeing Elementary in particular, in my opinion I always think it's designed to be unchanged, so we rarely see custom themes for it, just like what we see with Mac OS. Speaking about themes, Mint is the most customizable, meaning, clear settings available to switch, add, remove, and mix desktop themes. To help you learn more about this, do not forget that in our GNU/Linux community, we also have KDE's HIG and GNOME's HIG. Concerning HIG, Deepin and Cinnamon do not have such thing. Another example, we apps on Elementary lack settings? Because, the HIG says so. For example, why, you say, Elementary does not have minimize buttons? The answer is, because, the HIG says so. This HIG is the cause of how Elementary behaves and every app developer designs their app to look like what we've seen.
#LINUX MINT VS ELEMENTARY OS MAC OS#
Speaking about design, the most distinct one here is Pantheon, as it has its own Human Interface Guidelines (HIG), just like Apple Mac OS with its HIG, a detailed documentation to construct on how apps and user interface should look like.
#LINUX MINT VS ELEMENTARY OS PC#
Finally, I wish you can empower your PC and laptop with one of them. You will also find which one still supports 32-bit PC nowadays, which one supports Flatpak by default, and more. (Deepin 15.10, Mint 19, and Elementary 5.0 showing their desktops with start menu opened)